Tag: Censorship

  • The doctors who have tried to share treatments for COVID have been silenced.

    I contracted COVID myself, my wife and I did in October. She had it easier than I did. I’m 58 but I have some medical problems, and it went into my lungs so I developed the pulmonary part of COVID. And I felt the anxiety of having trouble breathing. And I just can’t imagine being a senior citizen with heart and lung disease and having it. It must be incredibly anxiety-provoking. And during my recovery, I made a series of videos of what I did. Now, fortunately, of course, I’m a doctor. I got myself into a research protocol, and I took the drugs in sequence, and I did all the right things. But one of my recovery videos I did exactly that. What you just described. I laid out the various drugs, the pulse oximeter, how to check blood pressure, the drugs, and I actually even had the packages of the medications. And I wore a tie, and it was a respectful, decent video. I was amazed that YouTube struck that video down within two days, and said that it violates the terms of the community. My very first YouTube video was just the release of my scientific findings, “The American Journal of Medicine”. It was just four slides from the paper, was struck down.

    From a peer-reviewed paper.

    From a peer-reviewed paper.

    They’re probably one of the three most prestigious journals in the country, and you got purged off of YouTube for-

    Right. So, Dr. Kory has also been scrubbed, and then Dr. Lowry in the UK has been scrubbed. We’re not the only ones. This is a worldwide phenomenon. Any word on early treatment, any word at all, there are powerful forces out there that can seek out our findings and our message and scrub them from ever getting to patients in need. What’s going on is extraordinary right now. And I think a lot of investigation will be done. Investigative historians are going to look at this very carefully. How can this be? If I did a video on how to treat a heart attack, that wouldn’t have been scrubbed. I have 600 papers in the peer-reviewed literature. 600, one of the most published people in the world. Why is it one paper on COVID and trying to disseminate its findings are absolutely scrubbed? Why is there such a massive resistance to getting these principles disseminated? That is the trillion-dollar question on the table. It’s cost hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of lives worldwide. And I think people need to understand and get to the bottom of what’s going on.

    Dr. Peter McCullough, Source

    I was invited to give Medicine Grand Rounds, which is common as an endowed lecturer, at a prestigious East Coast university, and which I’ve done my entire career for 30 years. And I gave my topic. I said, “The pathophysiologic basis and rationale for the early ambulatory treatment of COVID-19.” My sponsor said, “Oh, that’s interesting. That’s going to really get people’s attention.” I said, “Yeah, that’s what I want to talk about.” He said, “Fine.” He submitted it. It was gone through the process. I submitted all my forms for continuing medical education, my questions, my rationale, conflicts of interest of which I have none. I did everything by the book. The night before I’m going to deliver this lecture by Webex I get a panic call. It says, “Dr. McCullough, we can’t have you give this lecture tomorrow.” I said, “Why? This is scientific discourse, it’s what we do.” He said, “Our infectious disease doctors went to the Chairman of Medicine and said, ‘We can’t let Dr. McCullough give that lecture. And if he did, we would wanna prepare a rebuttal to everything he said.’” I have never witnessed this in my life. I have given thousands of medical lectures. I’ve lectured at the New York Academy of Sciences. I’ve presented before the FDA and the Congressional Oversight Panel, the Senate. I’ve lectured across the world. I’ve never had a doctor groupthink formulate an idea that there must be a rebuttal. We never do this at Medical Grand Rounds. We never do this.

    Dr. Peter McCullough, Source

    In response to this quote, RFK Jr. said this:

    I’m going to make you a bet that virtually all of those infectious disease academics who killed your speech are, if you look at their COIs on their publications, it will show grants from NIAID that they’re on Tony Fauci’s payroll.

    RFK Jr., Source

    I, you know, I learned about Russia and Russian communism and all the propaganda and Nazi Germany and their propaganda machine. I didn’t realize to what degree we live in a a matrix of mind control. For example, if you Google my name on, if you Google my name, the first thing will come up is this doctor is under investigation for this. This doctor is doing this, this doctor is being criticized. It’s custom. The algorithms in Google are designed specifically that anything that’s positive, or good regarding COVID19 is sent to malware. And anything that is derogatory, to first of all to the studies, whatever negative studies that there are or negative information, goes to the top of the Google search engine. Same thing on YouTube. YouTube is taking down all my videos, not only mine, anyone who’s, who’s talking about this, Oh wait, isn’t YouTube owned by Google?

    So there is a propaganda machine going on here of such corruption, such a coverup that has resulted in the mass murder of so many Americans.

    Dr. Zelenko, Source

    This page is incomplete and will be added to.

  • What is Propaganda?

    Source

    Please pay attention, which side is:

    • paying for ad space online, in your town, on commercials?
    • bribing people to follow their ways, with donuts, money, etc.?
    • censoring any message that is different?
    • making sure that every site you go to has the same “important information”?
    • setting up internet searches so they all find the same info?
    • telling you not to question their science, because it’s settled?
    • discouraging you from looking at any ill-effects of their way of doing things?
    • knocking down those who disagree, with name-calling and generalizations that those who think differently are stupid?

    I’m seeing people use the phrase “anti-vax propaganda,” but I think we really have to look at what propaganda is. What’s the REAL propaganda here?

    I am fine with you having a different view about the v from me. You can take it if you choose. You can try to convince your relatives to take it, too. I don’t mind if you share the evidence of your way of thinking on social media. It does not offend me that you think differently from me.

    BUT it seems like my way of thinking, thinking differently, questioning the propaganda and the groupthink, offends a lot of people. Many have fallen into believing the lie that “censorship = safety.” No, censorship equals a loss of freedom, a loss of individualality, and censorship is one of the main ways people with bad intentions gain control over a group. Please look through any undesirable and embarassing history–censorship usually played a role.

    Just watch how so-called “anti-vaxxers,” those who question the way the group has been told to think (via propaganda), when they simply ask a *question* on a public forum. People pounce on those who think differently or ask questions that go against the narrative. Its SCARY, guys!!! In the last year, we’ve become a society where different ways of thinking are considered “conspiracies” and “misinformation” and “dangerous.” Say that sentence out loud and really think about it. Do you believe those who think differently from you and share their thoughts are *dangerous*?

    If so, we’ve become a dystopian society like the one in Fahrenheit 451. Take away people’s ability to think and question and speak, and you take away their freedom. You take away their humanity.

    Please share this image and this post on social media:

    Watch for the propaganda today! Comment below and tell me all about what you saw.