COVID-19 was Foretold (or perhaps planned).

3 months before we all learned about anthrax, there was a simulation event to plan for something like anthrax. Anthrax was used as an excuse to get our country into a war. We learned later that the premise of the disease we had all been told was a lie. There was no need for the extreme response. 3 months before we all learned about Covid-19, there was a simulation event to plan for something like Covid-19 called Event 201. Event 201 Videos Here is a transcript from Event 201 about “misinformation” and the control of social media.

The Rockefeller Foundation’s Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, “Operation Lock Step” is an eerie foretelling of COVID-19 and all of the measures taken by governments. You can find the document at Academia and Truth Comes to Light

Some quotes from the document:

The pandemic also
had a deadly effect on economies: international
mobility of both people and goods screeched to
a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and
breaking global supply chains.

Even locally,
normally bustling shops and office buildings sat
empty for months, devoid of both employees
and customers.


The United States’s initial policy of
“strongly discouraging” citizens from flying
proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the
spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but
across borders. However, a few countries did
fare better—China in particular. The Chinese
government’s quick imposition and enforcement
of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well
as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of
all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping
the spread of the virus far earlier than in other
countries and enabling a swifter postpandemic recovery


During the pandemic,
national leaders around the world flexed their
authority and imposed airtight rules and
restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face
masks to body-temperature checks at the entries
to communal spaces like train stations and
supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded,
this more authoritarian control and oversight
of citizens and their activities stuck and even


willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and
their privacy—to more paternalistic states
in exchange for greater safety and stability.
Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for
top-down direction and oversight, and national
leaders had more latitude to impose order in the
ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this
heightened oversight took many forms: biometric
IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter
regulation of key industries whose stability
was deemed vital to national interests. In many
developed countries, enforced cooperation with a
suite of new regulations and agreements slowly
but steadily restored both order and, importantly,
economic growth.


and innovators were often told by governments
what research lines to pursue and were guided
mostly toward projects that would make money
(e.g., market-driven product development) or
were “sure bets” (e.g., fundamental research),
leaving more risky or innovative research
areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and
monopolistic companies with big research and
development budgets still made significant
advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs
remained locked behind strict national or
corporate protection


By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of
so much top-down control and letting leaders
and authorities make choices for them.

Joe Biden tweeted this the same week as Event 201: