My very first podcast is up today! You can listen to it here:
I’d like to address a couple of the points I made and share the evidence here:
First of all, I read from Colossians 1:1-12 and I encourage you to do the same! Let’s be in prayer together!
Florida Church Article
The church article can be found on CNN here: 6 members of a Florida church died of Covid-19 in 2 weeks, pastor says. On Sunday the church held a vaccination clinic. The church mentioned is Impact Church in Jacksonville, Florida.
Chance of Dying From Covid
I mentioned that the church had a 0.1% chance of dying from Covid. I did that math like this: 6 divided by 6,000 = 0.001 or 0.1% after you move the decimal point.
I also mentioned that the general population has a .2% chance of dying from Covid. I did that math like this: 633,126 total deaths in the US divided by 331,449,281 (US population) = 0.0019 or 0.2% after you move the decimal point and round up. Sadly, this number isn’t found anywhere on the CDC, the White House or any news organization. They speak of the percentage of 85 year olds dying from Covid vs 18 year olds, making it seem very scary (but without pointing out that the risk for 18 year olds is nearly zero percent).
White House Push to Vaccinate Faith Communities
I mentioned that there is a push from the White House to encourage pastors to get their churches vaccinated:
President Biden on Thursday urged religious leaders to encourage members of their communities to get vaccinated against the coronavirus as soon as they are eligible as the White House battles vaccine hesitancy.Source
This was from April 2021.
CNN’s Article Promoting the Vaccines is Propaganda
First, while it appears that we have many media stations to choose from, they are really all owned by 6 men. Here’s the list of the companies and the men who decide what we see.
Almost twenty years ago, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) reported this:
Do reporters know that so much medical news is actually unpaid advertising? The most effective industry influence is so well-hidden that many reporters and producers are totally unaware of it. The role of pharmaceutical companies and other health care industry interests in shaping news coverage of medical products and treatment is as invisible as it is pervasive.Source
We should not forget that in 2009, Pfizer was fined 2.9 billion dollars for illegally marketing. Source Pfizer does not have a good corporate rap sheet (source), but then again, neither does Johnson and Johnson (source).
Journalist Alicia Mundy published a book about unethical journalism, directed by the pharmaceutical industry. Her colleagues were unwilling to share information about these practices and her book, Dispensing with the Truth. She said:
“As a journalist, I had a great network of friends and colleagues that could have helped me to bring attention to these scandals,” Mundy told Extra!, “but most of the media did not cover the story of how drug companies shape media coverage of their products.”Source
That was in 2002, this corruption has been going on a long time, as both the media and the drug company’s pockets grew deeper. By 2016, pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer were paying out 5.2 billion in drug ads each year. Source
Pfizer doesn’t appear to be the philanthropic organization that the media would portray them as, either. They are out to make money, and their marketing department is in full gear.
When asked “Does Pfizer have to think differently now about how it advertises, how it markets?” the CEO of Pfizer said:
Clearly, the answer is yes. We are doing experiments right now with our sales reps, the same way that we are doing experiments with COVID vaccines. We have a placebo group and another group. Some reps are implementing new digital approaches, and then others are implementing the traditional approaches, 100 on each side.Source
The bottom line is that we cannot trust the media to present fair and honest reports about pharmaceutical companies.
According to a 2009 study by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, with the exception of CBS every major media outlet in the United States shares at least one board member with at least one drug company. Let me put it in perspective for you, these board members wake up, they go to a meeting at Merck or Pfizer, and then they have their driver take them over to a meeting with NBC to decide what kind of programming that network is going to air. For those board members who aren’t pulling double duty with a media conglomerate and a big drug company, they still understand that they can’t be honest and objective about big pharma because big pharma pays their bills.
Drug companies spend about $5 billion a year on advertising with these corporate media outlets, so when Pfizer or Merck or Eli Lilly, or any of the drug companies, kill or cripple Americans with defective drugs, do you really think these board members are going to allow their story to be told on the air? It can take anywhere from three days to a full week before the media reports on a drug or a medical device recall, if they report at all.Source
Another subject that I’ll need to touch on another day is big pharma’s investment in politics. They’re influencing us in very big ways, and most people don’t realize it.
Three things to know about the long-term side effects of COVID vaccines article
Follow the Money
Paul Goepfert, M.D. has received two private grants from Pfizer, according to his research page. That should have been stated as a conflict of interest in the article.
Also, Goepfert’s university, UAB, “received more than $325 million in research funding from the National Institutes of Health in 2020”. Source
The National Institutes for Health (NIH) gives 41.7 billion dollars annually towards medical research. Anthony Fauci is the director of the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
Relative Risk vs. Absolute Risk
I made a mistake in my statement about the “background rate” of infection and I included the phrase “natural immunity.” Scratch that. This isn’t about natural immunity, it’s about our chance of catching the virus and being hospitalized or dying. I apologize for the confusion.
I first heard about Relative Risk vs. Absolute Risk from Dr. Paul Meehan on an episode of the Highwire. You can listen to the podcast version on iHeartRadio. You can see the entire episode on Bitchute.
The article: Absolute Risk vs. Relative Risk: What’s the difference? has some great infographics to explain the difference and why the headlines use Relative Risk so often. Here’s a quote from the article:
Relative risks are often reported in newspaper headlines, but without the context of absolute (or baseline) risk, this information is meaningless. Absolute risk numbers are needed to understand the implications of relative risks and how specific factors or behaviours affect your likelihood of developing a disease or health condition.Source
Another article, from Oxford Academic; Relative risk versus absolute risk: one cannot be interpreted without the other , states:
Relative risks have the appealing feature of summarizing two numbers (the risk in one group and the risk in the other) into one. However, this feature also represents their major weakness, that the underlying absolute risks are concealed and readers tend to overestimate the effect when it is presented in relative terms. In many situations, the absolute risk gives a better representation of the actual situation and also from the patient’s point of view absolute risks often give more relevant information.Source
Dr. Meehan shared some images on the Highwire and I took some screenshots to share with you here:
Dangers of Vaccines Defined
In the article, Windsor states:
There are several reasons, actually. Vaccines, given in one- or two-shot doses, are very different from medicines that people take every day, potentially for years. And decades of vaccine history — plus data from more than a billion people who have received COVID vaccines starting last December — provide powerful proof that there is little chance that any new dangers will emerge from COVID vaccines.Source
It’s interesting that the FDA does recognize potential dangers emerging from Covid vaccines. Here is one of their slides from an October 2020 meeting, before the vaccines had emergency use authorization:
You can see all of the slides here. So, the FDA recognized that some pretty serious diseases could emerge, even autoimmune disease, which wouldn’t happen right away. But, Dr. Goepfert stated:
“The side effects that we see occur early on, and that’s it,” Goepfert said. “In virtually all cases, vaccine side effects are seen within the first two months after rollout.”Source
Demyelinating diseases (like Multiple Sclerosis) and autoimmune diseases may not show up in two months. Cancers can take years to show up. HPV vaccines can trigger demyelinating diseases and autoimmune conditions. (Source, Source) Long-term monitoring is needed to determine if Covid vaccines trigger demyelinating diseases, as they do contain mechanisms that could causes these issues. (Source) The risk of neurological and demyelinating diseases post-vaccination were recognized as early as 2003:
SEVERAL CASE reports of onset or recurrence of symptoms of demyelination after vaccination have raised concerns that vaccines may cause or exacerbate multiple sclerosis (MS) or other central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disorders. Although the greatest concern has been with hepatitis B vaccine,1–11 there also have been several reports after influenza vaccination12–22 and other vaccines.Source
The article goes on to say that these cases, could be “coincidental” and not because of the vaccine, of course, just like people will claim with the Covid shots. Because, it’s common knowledge (sarcasm) that every single death that also had a positive pcr test or a single Covid symptom was a Covid death, but every adverse event or even death post-Covid vaccination is just “coincidence.” Right.
We know that certain polio vaccines are linked to cancer. (Source, Source, Source) The CDC used to have information about this on their site but then scrubbed it. We don’t know if other vaccines lead to cancer simply because nobody is researching this. Like I said in the podcast, we can’t find what we’re not looking for. No evidence (because we weren’t looking) does not definitively determine that these adverse events aren’t happening.
Even the CDC recognizes that vaccines haven’t always had a blemish-free history. They list the following events:
- Cutter Incident 1955
- Simian Virus 40 (SV40) 1955-1963
- Swine Flu Vaccine and Guillain Barre Syndrome 1976
- Hepatitis B Vaccine and Multiple Sclerosis 1998
- Rotavirus Vaccine and Intussusception 1998-1999
- GBS and Meningococcal Vaccine 2005-2008
- Hib Vaccine Recall 2007
- H1N1 Influenza Vaccine and Narcolepsy 2009-2010
- Porcine Circovirus in Rotavirus Vaccines 2010
- HPV Vaccine Recall 2013
These incidents were recent enough that my children would have had these vaccines–perhaps yours, too? Has a doctor ever mentioned to you that your child’s health issues could have been caused by the very vaccines you were told would save them? Most doctors do not recognize the connection and even deny any correlation, stating, as Goepfert MD did, “vaccines are safe.” This history proves that vaccines have not always been safe, nor are they always safe for all people.
If you decide to research the list above (I suggest you do!), note this: while they know that vaccines have caused adverse events and even deaths, they have not recalled every single ingredient that caused these issues. They go on using ingredients today that they know caused issues in the past, and then they seem surprised when the same adverse events arise. Or, they deny the connection.
Long-Term Studies Are Necessary!
In every pubmed article about the association between vaccination and long-term disease, the conclusion contains a sentence that goes something like this: “Follow-up studies are needed,” or “Future research is necessary.” The problem is, nobody is doing long-term studies on vaccines.
Let’s unpack this quote:
“We learn about a vaccine’s safety during clinical trials before it is licensed, and monitor it continually as millions of doses are administered after it is licensed. We also know there is not a plausible biologic reason to believe vaccines would cause any serious long-term effects. Based on more than 50 years of experience with vaccines, we can say that the likelihood that a vaccine will cause unanticipated long-term problems is extremely low.”Parents’ Guide to Childhood Immunizations, Source
If you or your children got vaccines (I assume you would have been part of the “millions of doses administered,” was anyone monitoring your side effects continually? Was any doctor connecting the dots between symptoms in your teen and the booster shot she got at age ten? No. This quote is a fancy way to dance around the fact that nobody is actually following what these shots are doing to the population over the years.
The source above, Vaxopedia, listed fourteen supposed long-term studies in order to prove that long-term studies are done. Fourteen studies, huh? We’ve been vaccinating kids in the US at least since the first Polio trials in 1935 (and possibly before that) and we only have fourteen long-term studies? Interesting to note, many of these studies were not done in America.
The studies that were done in America were not working directly with patients, they were pulling medical files and deducting information from lab work. In other words, nobody was actually following up with these patients to ask about long-term adverse events. And, these studies are riddled with conflicts of interest, like funding directly from Pfizer.
There’s No Money in Long-Term Safety Studies
Let’s face it: if a percentage of the population ends up with a particular cancer from vaccines, the company will only lose money if they do research to prove it. The CDC, FDA, NIH–nobody is looking out for the health of the American people and requiring these kinds of studies. For the drug companies, it’s a win-win if we get sick from their shots. They profit off of the shots (billions of dollars) and then they profit off of the treatment. It’s a no-brainer, if you’re in this to make money (and, they are).
One Man’s Professional Opinion
I mentioned that this article is one man’s professional opinion, and that there are many more with equal credentials who have different opinions. Let me list a few right here:
- Ah Kahn Syed, MD, Leaked Pfizer Study: Vax Particles Massively Build Up In Ovaries
- Andrew Wakefield, MD, Is the Coronavirus Vaccine a Good Idea?
- Byram Bridle, MD, Vaccine researcher admits ‘big mistake,’ says spike protein is dangerous ‘toxin’
- Carrie Madej, MD, Urgent Information About COVID Vaccines
- David Martin, MD, It’s Gene Therapy, Not a Vaccine
- Elke De Klerk, MD, 87,000 Nurses Refuse C-19 Vaccine – Dr. Elke De Klerk, the founder of Doctors for Truth!
- Greg Nigh, ND, Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19
- Hooman Noorchashm MD, A Letter of Warning To FDA And Pfizer: On The Immunological Danger Of COVID-19 Vaccination In The Naturally Infected.
- Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D, Halt Covid Vaccine, Prominent Scientist Tells CDC
- Jane Orient, MD, MASS VACCINE BACKFIRE: WHY ONE COVID VACCINE IS PULLED AND NOT OTHERS (GUEST: JANE ORIENT, M.D.)
- Jane Ruby, MD, What’s The Actual Damage Caused By The COVID Jab?
- Jeffrey Barke, MD, Healthcare Workers Refusing Covid Vaccines: A Medical Doctor Explains Why
- Jim Meehan, MD, EMERGENCY DECLARATION: FROM THE DESK OF DR. MEEHAN AVOID THE EXPERIMENTAL CoVID-19 VACCINATION
- Luc Montagnier, MD, Nobel Prize winner: Mass COVID vaccination an ‘unacceptable mistake’
- Meryl Nass, MD, Pfizer Admitted its Vaccine Does NOT Prevent Covid Infection
- Michael Yeadon, MD, ‘Severe’ Adverse Reactions And Mass Death From mRNA COVID Vaccines ‘Virtually Guaranteed’
- Peter Gotzsche, MD, Dr. Peter Gotzsche exposes big pharma as organized crime
- Peter McCullough, MD, Highly cited COVID doctor comes to stunning conclusion: Gov’t ‘scrubbing unprecedented numbers’ of injection-related deaths
- Richard Fleming, MD, Expert Cardiologist Warns Covid Vaccines Could Cause Mad Cow Disease
- Ronald Brown, MD, Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Clinical Trials
- Ryan, Cole, MD, Pathologist Shows Vaccine Damage Is Visible in All Human Tissues And Organs
- Stephen Karanja, MD, “Is This Vaccine A Commercial Enterprise?”
- Wahome Ngare, MD, “Is This Vaccine A Commercial Enterprise?”
- Sunetra Gupta, MD, “I Don’t Think We Should Be Vaccinating Everybody” — Theoretical Epidemiologist Prof. Sunetra Gupta
And, I highly recommend Dr. Peter McCullough’s podcast at America Out Loud.
This is just a sampling of MANY doctors who are speaking out about early treatment options (therefore, no need for a vaccine) and about the dangers of these vaccines.
These Vaccines are Different
The Covid shots are mRNA technology, which have been studied for two decades, but have never been injected in humans until the clinical trials for the Covid shots. The CDC recognizes that:
mRNA vaccines are a new type of vaccine to protect against infectious diseases.Source
We can’t say, like Dr. Goepfert implied, that these shots will behave exactly like all vaccines through history. They’re not designed to behave the same.
The CDC states:
mRNA vaccines teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies.Source
This is concerning. With these new shots, we are training our immune system to trigger an immune response against proteins created by our own cells. Isn’t that the very definition of autoimmune disease?
The inventor of mRNA, Dr. Robert Malone, has been speaking up about dangers they did not recognize when creating these vaccines. (Source) Please listen to what he is saying.
That’s all for now!
I hope you enjoyed the podcast and all of this information! Feel free to comment below with more sources or questions. I enjoy learning from what you have learned!